A riverside pub cannot be converted into a home, a government planning inspector has ruled.
The Lazy Otter, in Stretham, near Ely, must remain a pub after its owner failed to convince officials the property was not viable as a business.
Chris Baxter, a government-appointed planning inspector, agreed with East Cambridgeshire District Council’s decision to refuse the change of use plans.
He said: “From the submitted evidence, I am not satisfied that sufficient justification has been provided to demonstrate that the use of the premises as a public house cannot be financially viable either for the appellant or for another user.
“There is also no compelling evidence before me which indicates that since the appellants have owned the premises, that all reasonable efforts have been made to sell or let the property for community purposes at a realistic price for at least 12 months.”
- READ MORE: Couple banned from turning Lazy Otter pub into their home
- READ MORE: Petition launched to save village pub
The appeal was submitted by Rita Walsh, who purchased The Lazy Otter in November 2021.
She was also appealing against a council enforcement notice for living at the property.
But again, Mr Baxter, agreed with the council and she now has nine months to vacate the building.
His report also mentioned an application form that had been completed incorrectly where Miss Walsh stated the change of use plans were completed by December 2021.
She explained it was completed in this way “because they were living in the upstairs residential part of the building at the time”.
However when the council, and the inspector, visited on separate occasions both were told the owners were sleeping downstairs.
Mr Baxter noted a shower in one of the toilet cubicles, the gents toilets had washing machines installed and there were other items “not normally considered typical features of a public house”.
Despite the appellants arguing the property could still reopen as a pub if, the inspector concluded changes had been carried out without the required planning permission.
Miss Walsh has also had an application for costs to be paid dismissed.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here